Goetia Pathworking: Magickal Results from The 72 Demons (Magick of Darkness and Light)

The majority of these reviews for this occult book appear genuine, with only a small subset showing potential manipulation patterns. Most reviewers provide specific personal experiences, detailed ritual outcomes, and balanced perspectives that reflect authentic engagement with the material. The presence of both 5-star and critical reviews (including a detailed 1-star review) creates a natural distribution that suggests organic feedback rather than coordinated manipulation.

Strong evidence of authenticity includes multiple reviews with specific personal narratives: Review #3 describes the book's texture and the user's learning journey, Review #6 details multiple ritual attempts with varying success rates and compares this book to another work, Review #10 provides a French-language account of a specific ritual with Ronove and purification practices, and Review #13 offers extensive journal-style documentation of multiple demon workings. These detailed, idiosyncratic accounts with personal context strongly indicate genuine users who have actually engaged with the material.

Some concerns exist with a few reviews that use generic praise without specifics or repetitive marketing language. Review #2 is extremely brief with vague praise, Review #5 contains only the word "Great," Review #8 uses promotional phrases like "no nonsense approach" and "brilliant fast results" without personal context, and Review #12 is a single foreign word without elaboration. These patterns suggest possible padding or low-effort reviews, though they could also represent genuine but brief feedback.

Overall, this appears to be a product with genuinely engaged users who provide detailed feedback about their experiences with Goetic magic. While a small percentage of reviews show characteristics that could indicate manipulation, the majority demonstrate authentic engagement through specific personal narratives, varied experiences (both successful and unsuccessful), and detailed descriptions of ritual practices that would be difficult to fabricate convincingly.

Key patterns identified in the review analysis include: Detailed personal ritual experiences, Specific demon names and procedures mentioned, Balanced comparisons with other occult works.