Scar Silicone Gel Sheets for Stretch Marks: Advanced Scar Removal Sheets for Old and New Scars from Surgery - C Section - Burns - Acne - Injury - Keloid Treatment for Skin Types of Ears - Face - Body

The overwhelming majority of these reviews appear genuine, with only a few showing potential manipulation patterns. All 13 reviews are verified purchases (indicated by 'V'), which significantly increases their credibility. Most reviews contain specific personal experiences, detailed product observations, and natural language that suggests authentic user feedback rather than coordinated promotion. The high concentration of 5-star ratings is expected for a medical product that delivers promised results, as satisfied customers are more likely to leave reviews.

Strong evidence of authenticity includes multiple reviews with personal medical contexts (c-section scars, sensitive skin, old vs. new scars), specific usage details (cutting to size, reusability periods of 1-3 days, shower resistance), and balanced perspectives acknowledging the need for patience. Review #2 provides medical-grade terminology with appropriate cautions, while review #6 is in French with natural phrasing, suggesting diverse genuine users. Review #4 offers particularly compelling authenticity with its timeline (one year post-c-section) and comparison between old and new scar treatment.

Only minor concerns exist: review #10 is extremely brief and generic ('These work great, I’m glad I got them'), which could indicate a low-effort genuine review or potential manipulation. Review #13 is similarly brief but includes comparative information ('more sticky') that suggests authentic experience. There are no clear patterns of repetitive marketing language or coordinated phrasing across multiple reviews that would indicate organized manipulation.

Overall, this appears to be a product with genuinely satisfied customers sharing detailed experiences. The few brief reviews could represent either authentic low-effort feedback or potential manipulation, but they represent a small minority. The presence of specific medical details, varied writing styles, and personal anecdotes strongly supports the authenticity of most reviews, with any potential fake content being minimal and not following clear manipulation patterns.

Key patterns identified in the review analysis include: Personal medical context (c-section, sensitive skin), Specific usage details (cutting to size, shower resistance, reusability), Natural language variation including French review.